What Are Prospective Donors Being Told (and Not Being Told) About the Georgian Bay Geopark?
The Georgian Bay Geopark’s Small Change Fund page is aimed at prospective donors and currently shows $831,803 raised toward a $1 million goal. It describes the initiative in terms of partnership, community involvement and open dialogue.
The issue isn’t that a fundraising page presents a project positively. The question is whether prospective donors are being given enough information to understand the extent of disagreement and opposition surrounding the initiative.
The Geopark’s own recent correspondence acknowledges concerns that do not appear on the fundraising page, which paints a more complicated picture:
Fundraising Page
“After more than three years of research, partnership building, and listening, we are entering a new phase—sharing what has been learned and inviting open, transparent dialogue across the region.”
Recent Correspondence
“We understand that there is concern that the initiative moved ahead without sufficient consultation and that references to Manitoulin Island in our materials may have created the impression of participation or support where none had been given.”
Those two statements appear difficult to reconcile.
Fundraising Page
“It is a voluntary, community-driven partnership network”
Recent Correspondence
“our materials may have created the impression of participation or support where none had been given.”
That raises a question about how “community-driven partnership network” should be understood when municipal participation or support may not have been given.
Fundraising Page
“A grassroots initiative is now underway to bring communities, First Nations, and regional partners together to explore the creation of the Georgian Bay Geopark—one of the most remarkable of its kind in the world, with the long-term goal of UNESCO designation.”
Recent Correspondence
“We recognize that trust has to be earned, and that the first step is a more respectful and direct conversation.”
That raises a question about how broadly the community, First Nations and regional partnership described on the fundraising page actually extends.
Meanwhile, neither the fundraising page nor the June letter discloses the formal opposition expressed by 11 municipalities, eight First Nations, three conservation organizations and three community groups.
That matters because UNESCO says the establishment of a UNESCO Global Geopark should be based on a bottom-up process involving relevant local and regional stakeholders and authorities, with firm commitment from local communities and strong local partnerships with long-term public and political support.
The extent of the opposition to the Georgian Bay proposal is information a prospective donor may reasonably want to know.
The Geopark’s fundraising materials indicate that more than $360,000 has been raised since the first documented letter of opposition in June 2025 and donations currently are just north of $831,000.
If you were considering donating to the Geopark, wouldn’t you want to know about this information before deciding whether to contribute?
